Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Standing Tall and Looking Good


As an active duty Army major and a professed lover of “Army Wives,” I consider the show to be a civilian-friendly version of some of the events that might happen in “everyday” Army life. (Life that might happen in situations with gross generalizations and high-drama one-hour solutions…yet totally addictive!) However, I must take a moment to address an ever-present issue that continues to surface each season: Col. Joan Burton has worn pearl studs with her Army Combat Uniform (ACU) in several previous episodes and did so again in the May 6 “Fallout” episode! Yes, this really happened in television life even though Army Regulation 670-1 prohibits women from wearing earrings with the ACU. (And even though I still quietly pray for the glorious day when the Army finally allows females to wear studs with our ACU…So far 13 years in and still a no-go. I’ll keep hope alive. I digress…)

Section 1-14 of Chapter 1 in AR 670-1 specifically states, “Females are not authorized to wear earrings with any class C (utility) uniform (BDU, hospital duty, food service, physical fitness, field, or organizational).” http://www.apd.army.mil/pdffiles/r670_1.pdf

Col. Burton is an awesome character. She is a very positive representative of a soldier, not to mention a wonderful example of a female servicemember and a woman of color. She does what’s right, is awesome in the workplace, and works well with managing/balancing her family life as well. These are all great things for servicemembers (regardless of rank or cultural background) to emulate…but her on-camera uniform should reflect reality – as is the case with the male characters on the show. Producers and/or costume designers should respect the uniform for which so many are honored to and privileged to wear.

So rewind: What if real life could imitate art? Why is it that the Army is the only U.S. military service that doesn’t allow its females to wear earrings? The Air Force, Navy and even the Marines (yes, I said “even”) allow females to wear earrings with their service uniform. What’s with the Army…especially in a garrison environment?

Several of my male Army comrades have noted that Air Force and Navy females overall present themselves in a much more polished and ladylike manner than in Army females. Sadly, I too have noticed this time and time again (apart from myself and a few other Army females). Apart from the misfortune surrounding stud earrings, women in the Army can often appear…rough. As did Mama Morton and Velma E. in Chicago, dare I ask, “What ever happened to class?”

It’s great to be able to sharp and physically fit, but doesn’t appearance also play a role in the overall package when “standing tall and looking good?” So ladies, we’ve gotta carry ourselves with professionalism, with a little class, and with pride regardless of military service or career field. As we walk through the tough world we call life, let’s put a little pep our step and some umph in our stride. Keeping in mind that there is indeed someone looking up to you as their example of how a professional woman should appear, represent well – regardless of whether you’re wearing combat boots, Louboutin heels, or anything in between.

7 comments:

  1. I totally agree with you Junel! Love your blog!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. bravissima~! i never did understand why we couldn't were stud earrings with our ACUs. heArt!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I personally and professionally do not have a problem with women wearing earrings in ACUs.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Professionally, I think it would add credibility to the words that we publicly speak when characterizing the Army as a professional organization. Not only do our sister services allow females to wear stud earrings but so do our DOD female employees who are required to wear business attire to work. Therefore if earrings are considered a componet of busines attire, for the lack of a better word, why not allow Army females to at least wear it with the ASU. Many changes have been instituted in the recent past - for example, Soldiers must wear the ASU on fridays at the Pentagon. If the ASU represents our "official" business attire, why not let our females wear the studs and look their professional and personal best while personifying the Army look. What say you...?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jose: Army females can wear studs in ASUs. It's the ACU thats at odds with the other services...It's not only the earrings, but just the overall look (or often the lack thereof). IJS we can do better.

      Delete
  5. My name is Major George Zeckeler and I am currently a student at the Command and General Staff College, U.S. Army Combined Arms Center's Fort Lee satellite campus. I must say that I agree with your assessment that women should be allowed to wear stud earrings in their ACUs, similar to the other 3 services who allow stud earrings for their females in service uniforms. Who knows, maybe it will happen soon. With recent changes to uniform benefiting females such as the wearing of a "ponytail" in the APFT uniform and other changes like allowing women to serve in combat units, the future is bright for our female service members.
    Regardless if they allow this earring change or not in the future,

    I am proud to serve along our female service members! I have worked with wonderful female officers, NCOs, and Soldiers and have had the fortune of having female mentors who have helped guide me throughout my career. I feel that our Army women already "stand tall and look good" as stated in an earlier entry in this blog. With more and more women in leadership roles and achieving all ranks, I know the Army will continue to lead with wonderful leaders, such as many I have had the fortune of working with and working for.

    Thank you for these blog postings and bringing to attention how a TV show may better be able to "respect" our uniform as they present active duty service members on shows like Army Wives. However, I must say that I feel a sense of pride every time I see one of my fine fellow Army Soldiers on the television in ACUs or any other Army uniform.

    Please note: the views I have expressed in this blog entry are my own views, written freely and without coercion, and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Arbitrary and capricious?

    I would like to think that the prohibition against the wear of earrings by female Soldiers is founded on some practical and tested principle, that some logic exists to support its existence. Yet, I have my doubts since our sister services permit the wear of studded earrings. I would like to see the battery of tests that indicate that the prohibition is anything but arbitrary; I am open to all positions.

    On a similar note, appearance standards have recently drawn a bit of attention with the attempt by the SMA to increase the reach of AR 670-1 to off-duty appearance and apparel. Purpose? Is there some overriding governmental/Army interest that is served? ”Soldier 24-7” has got to be the immediate response, yet before that cliché breaks the plane of your mouth, inquire into the spectrum of activities that could then be regulated on your “off-duty” hours…bikers you may have to put your chaps back in the closet, females no more skirts that show skin, gents shirts/ties/sport coats while in public. Arbitrary? Capricious?

    Scott

    Please note: the views I have expressed in this blog entry are my own views, written freely and without coercion, and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, Department of Defense, or the US Government.

    ReplyDelete